Randy Ubillos, a designer behind the first three iterations of Adobe. Arneby Having tried Premiere, FCPX, (Sony) Vegas, a little bit of Avid and some Resolve over the years I seem to always come back to FCPX whenever there's a Mac available. I don't remember what its features are off the top of my head, but it looked like a decent enough basic editor. Macromedia initially created Final Cut Pro as an alternative to Adobe Premiere, designed to work alongside Apples QuickTime. Most users think Final Cut Pro X is a great alternative to Adobe Premiere Pro. It was only $50 and I was surprised to see that its UI looked somewhat similar to Premiere/FCP.
#Alternative to adobe final cut pro pc manual#
I remember one of the kids in my extended family had received a program called Magix or something like that. I used Final Cut Pro X to do the majority of my video editing when I had my Macbook Pro, however now I am back to having a PC, and the problem I am facing is that Sony Vegas Pro is a very complex editor with a strong learning curve. When comparing Adobe Rush to software like Final Cut Pro or Adobe Premiere Pro you will notice that it lacks manual controls options. There are all kinds of options on the consumer side, ranging in price from $30-ish to over $100. It was really popular with a couple of news editors I used to work with several years ago and appeared to be a stable and no-frills kind of application. The only other pro-level editor I'm aware of right now is Edius. It is more affordable software, and there are different levels to choose from that provide a fair tradeoff between price and features/performance. Adobe no longer sells permanent non-subscription licenses for any of its professional software titles.Īlternatively, there is Avid, which is another industry standard title. You can pay around $20/month for Premiere all by itself, or you can get access to Adobe's entire software catalog for $50/month. Premiere is really the closest alternative to FCP.